http://purl.org/np/RAhlnTORaj... RAhlnTORaj

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type type

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/PartialAgreementComment PartialAgreementComment

Ricardo Usbeck

2021-10-19T12:29:57.504Z

http://purl.org/np/RAhlnTORaj... RAhlnTORaj

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type type

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/PointAddressedComment PointAddressedComment

Ricardo Usbeck

2021-10-19T12:29:57.504Z

http://purl.org/np/RAhlnTORaj... RAhlnTORaj

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type type

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/ResponseComment ResponseComment

Ricardo Usbeck

2021-10-19T12:29:57.504Z

http://purl.org/np/RAhlnTORaj... RAhlnTORaj

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/hasCommentText hasCommentText

I do have to agree. However, I changed it to affects instead of causes since it is a negation and leaves the option open to find a positive correlation in the future.

Ricardo Usbeck

2021-10-19T12:29:57.504Z

http://purl.org/np/RAhlnTORaj... RAhlnTORaj

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/refersTo refersTo

http://purl.org/np/RA7MgxMCcV... RA7MgxMCcV

Ricardo Usbeck

2021-10-19T12:29:57.504Z

http://purl.org/np/RAhlnTORaj... RAhlnTORaj

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/isResponseTo isResponseTo

http://purl.org/np/RAnb5-OisR... RAnb5-OisR

Ricardo Usbeck

2021-10-19T12:29:57.504Z