http://purl.org/np/RAIHIka6Md... RAIHIka6Md

links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance

http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo wasAttributedTo

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn

Tobias Kuhn

2023-06-07T09:55:05.560Z

http://purl.org/np/RAIHIka6Md... RAIHIka6Md

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator creator

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn

Tobias Kuhn

2023-06-07T09:55:05.560Z

http://purl.org/np/RAIHIka6Md... RAIHIka6Md

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://purl.org/spar/cito/reviews reviews

http://purl.org/np/RA6PE7E1Vz... RA6PE7E1Vz

Tobias Kuhn

2023-06-07T09:55:05.560Z

http://purl.org/np/RAIHIka6Md... RAIHIka6Md

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment comment

I find the algorithm specified as "Fuzzy Logic" a bit too unspecific and I would call "Fuzzy Logic" a formalism, and not an algorithm. But the used vocabulary does classify it under "Algorithms", and so this seems to be a correct usage of that term from that perspective. This is therefore just a comment, and I suggest to leave the current representation.

Tobias Kuhn

2023-06-07T09:55:05.560Z