http://purl.org/np/RAAgR5ZKII... RAAgR5ZKII

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type type

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/DisagreementComment DisagreementComment

Valentin GROUÈS

2021-10-29T08:39:29.183Z

http://purl.org/np/RAAgR5ZKII... RAAgR5ZKII

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type type

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/PointNotAddressedComment PointNotAddressedComment

Valentin GROUÈS

2021-10-29T08:39:29.183Z

http://purl.org/np/RAAgR5ZKII... RAAgR5ZKII

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type type

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/ResponseComment ResponseComment

Valentin GROUÈS

2021-10-29T08:39:29.183Z

http://purl.org/np/RAAgR5ZKII... RAAgR5ZKII

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/hasCommentText hasCommentText

I don't think the original publication shows a causal relationship. It seems to me only a correlation is proven.

Valentin GROUÈS

2021-10-29T08:39:29.183Z

http://purl.org/np/RAAgR5ZKII... RAAgR5ZKII

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/refersTo refersTo

http://purl.org/np/RAeRSya2qI... RAeRSya2qI

Valentin GROUÈS

2021-10-29T08:39:29.183Z

http://purl.org/np/RAAgR5ZKII... RAAgR5ZKII

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/isResponseTo isResponseTo

http://purl.org/np/RAio--7IbP... RAio--7IbP

Valentin GROUÈS

2021-10-29T08:39:29.183Z